🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to restart talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Talks Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the locations had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions reopen.

Trump recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be ended by armed force. He said the strikes began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and continues the primary solution to address disputes, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the same tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the face of this attack."